A case of usurping a 20 crore bungalow in Sector 2 of Chandigarh by preparing fake documents has come to light. In which the Chandigarh Economic Offences Wing has taken action and registered an FIR against Rajinder Kaur Gill, Paramjit Kaur and Kamaldeep Kaur.
No one has been arrested in this case so far. After the arrest, more revelations will be made about who all helped them in making fake documents.
In the complaint given to the police by the complainant Satinder Singh Dhaliwal, it was told that these three women made fake documents and filed false affidavits to usurp the property worth 20 crores.
Satinder Singh Dhaliwal told in the complaint that on 19 August 1997, he had bought 50% share for Rs 15 lakh from the legal heirs of late Bachan Kaur. For this, not only the payment receipts and bank draft documents are available, but on the same day he was also handed over the possession of the East Wing of the house. Legally, power of attorney and wills were also registered in their favour.
Ex-party decree obtained from fake documents
According to the complainant, an ex-party decree was obtained on 06 May 1999 in the court of Civil Judge on the basis of a false agreement. In which it was shown that Bachan Kaur had given the rights of the said property in 1975. Whereas the original document was never filed in the court, nor was it shown to the estate office. This decree was rejected by the Supreme Court on 15 February 2016, and 50% share of the property was considered valid in the heirs of Bachan Kaur.
Despite the court order, Rajinder Kaur Gill, Paramjit Kaur and Kamaldeep Kaur deliberately raised fake objections in the estate office and refused to give possession. On 2 April 2025, the estate office implemented the order of the Supreme Court and divided the share of the property into 2 equal parts. 50% in favor of Satinder Singh Dhillon and 50% in favor of late. Names of heirs of Sadhu Singh.
Police complaint and SDM’s status-quo order
When Satinder Singh Dhillon reached the property to get it cleaned on 2 April 2022, there was a ruckus in protest and he was not allowed to enter. On the basis of the complaint given to Police Station Sector 3, SDM Central issued a status-quo order under Section 164 of BNSS (formerly Section 145/146 of CRPC) and directed the SHO to maintain law and order. After which the responsibility of investigating this case was handed over to the Economic Offenses Wing.
The complaint said that these women gave affidavits in the estate office on March 10, 1998 and called themselves the legal heirs of Sadhu Singh, while in the civil court claimed that they were not given rights in their father’s will. Such confusing and different statements show that these people are deliberately misleading government offices.
